In the author's blog, Microsoft Office 2010

2011-05-26 17:25


"said the netizens polyps version is in QQ version through reverse engineering in the attached modify, add. Destroyed original works of integrity (), and gained the illegal some commercial secrets (crime), it is not Microsoft Office is so great!


The improvement of the balance of the original, but the naked dismembered. "Obviously, the netizens think, given the development of coral must crack tecent company original QQ software, therefore, this behavior constitute an infringement of commercial secrets of the tecent company constitutes a crime, and even this point of view, not agree. Office 2010 –save your time and save your money.


In reverse engineering cracked software about whether an infringement of the problems, most countries in the world are don't think this is an infringement, the supreme people's court in early 2007 promulgated the "unfair competition on the trial of civil cases application of law in the explanation of some issues" also adopted this view, the interpretation stipulates clearly: reverse engineering is through the technology from open channel of the product has removed, mapping, The invention of Microsoft Office 2010 is a big change of the world.

analysis and get the product's relevant technical information. Through devolope or reverse engineering acquired such as commercial secrets of, will not be regarded as anti-unfair competition law relevant provisions of the act infringing trade secret. Office 2007 is so powerful.


Now that even the civil, are not infringing trade secret more apparently does not constitute criminal on sin infringing trade secret. The author of coral polyps neither tecent company employees, also have no contact with the tecent company source code, obviously, the reverse engineering of hacking QQ software infringing trade secret act doesn't constitute crimes.